Maison

When Distance Became a Governance Issue

2026-10-09

We apologize — this content isn’t currently offered in français.

A signed document on a glowing platform, connected to remote participants on video and to identity, signature, video, document, time, and record checks.

The Existing Assumption

For years, organizations treated remote signing as a document-delivery challenge. A document was sent, a signer completed fields, and the workflow recorded a result. For many routine agreements, this is sufficient.

The model made sense because the primary goal was efficiency. It removed travel, paper, scanning, and delays. But it also separated the agreement from much of the interaction that previously surrounded a consequential signing event.

The Market Shift

Today, high-value and high-consequence decisions are increasingly made across borders, time zones, and digital channels. At the same time, organizations face more sophisticated impersonation, fraud, and disputes about how consent was obtained.

The FTC reported that consumers lost more than 12.5 billion dollars to fraud in 2024. This was a 25 percent increase from the previous year.¹ Deloitte projects that fraud enabled by generative AI could reach 40 billion dollars in the United States by 2027.²

The Evidence Layer

In 2024, an employee at Arup was deceived into transferring approximately US$25 million after joining what appeared to be a legitimate video conference involving senior colleagues. The people on screen were deepfake impersonations.³

The lesson is not that every video interaction is untrustworthy. It is that visibility alone is no longer enough. A face on screen does not establish identity, authority, or the integrity of the transaction.

NIST’s Digital Identity Guidelines recognize identity proofing as a process requiring appropriate technical and procedural controls to establish confidence in a claimed identity.⁴ That principle applies beyond account access. It applies whenever an organization must establish confidence in the people participating in a consequential agreement.

The Insight

Distance is not the problem.

Unstructured distance is.

When a signing process is distributed across emails, separate video calls, document links, identity materials, and disconnected audit logs, organizations may have records of activity without a coherent account of the event.

Category Creation

Evidence-grade agreements bring governance into the remote environment. They connect participants, document control, identity steps, live communication, signing, and audit evidence in one deliberate process.

iinked VSR™ (Video Signing Room™) enables organizations to conduct live browser-based signing sessions where participants can communicate, review the document, complete signing steps, and preserve the interaction as part of the transaction record.

Future Implication

Remote work did not eliminate the need for governance. It made governance a design requirement.

The organizations that succeed in the next era of digital trust will not ask only whether an agreement can be completed remotely. They will ask whether the process can be understood, explained, and trusted after the session ends.

Sources

  1. Federal Trade Commission, “New FTC Data Show a Big Jump in Reported Losses to Fraud to $12.5 Billion in 2024,” 2025
  2. Deloitte, Mitigating AI Fraud Risks
  3. World Economic Forum, Lessons from Arup’s Deepfake Attack
  4. NIST SP 800-63A-4, Identity Proofing and Enrollment